\n\n
Islamic cleric Sheikh Ahmad Gumi has declared that no individual or group can prevent him from travelling to or visiting any part of Nigeria, following controversies surrounding his planned visit to Ibadan, Oyo State. The cleric made the statement while responding to criticism and opposition from some groups that had objected to his proposed engagement in the South-West region. (punchng.com)
Gumi maintained that Nigeria remains a united country where every citizen enjoys constitutional rights to freedom of movement and association. He argued that his visit was intended for peaceful religious and educational purposes and should not be interpreted through ethnic or political lenses. According to him, attempts to restrict his movements amount to a violation of the rights guaranteed to all Nigerians under the law. Reports indicate that some groups had expressed concerns over his presence in Ibadan because of his past comments on insecurity and his controversial engagements with armed groups during efforts to promote dialogue and peace. (punchng.com)
The cleric further stated that he has visited numerous states across the federation over the years and would continue to engage with communities wherever he is invited. He stressed that dialogue, education, and religious understanding remain important tools for addressing insecurity and national division. Gumi also called on Nigerians to reject hatred and regional mistrust, urging citizens to focus on unity and peaceful coexistence despite political and security challenges facing the country. (punchng.com)
The development has generated mixed reactions among political observers, community leaders, and social commentators. While supporters argue that every Nigerian has the right to move freely throughout the country, critics contend that some of Gumi’s past positions on security matters have made him a divisive figure. Nevertheless, legal experts note that freedom of movement is a constitutional right and can only be restricted under specific circumstances provided by law. The controversy highlights the continuing national debate over security, regional sensitivities, and the role of influential religious leaders in addressing Nigeria’s complex challenges.
